I decided to take a look at the platform of the Libertarian
Party of Canada, finding it at www.libertarian.ca/platform. The first plank
listed is to “Reduce federal income taxes to a maximum rate of 15% and increase
the personal income tax exemption amount to $17,300 from $11,500”, and I am
thinking “Whoa! That’s not really libertarian, is it?” Why stop at 15%? Just
repeal The Income Tax Act. Get rid of it…..and all the expense associated with
enforcing it. No more CRA wages or building costs. And while we are at it, get
rid of GST and any other federal sales tax. No more excise tax. Customs duties?
Gone. On anything and everything.
So, how would the federal government pay for necessary
expenditures? Glad you asked. They can just “print” money. It’s not really
printing, but rather electronic data in computers. Wouldn’t that cause
hyperinflation? No. First, there would be a legislated limit to the expansion
of the money supply. Second, production of goods and services would probably
increase rapidly in an environment of no tax, so that even though there was
more money chasing goods and services, these would be increasing along with
money. And even if your dollar was worth less, this depreciation would be
mitigated by you having the extra money that previously would have been applied
to taxes. And THAT is a LOT of money. A
prime influence upon price inflation is the velocity of money, and with the extra
money in private hands by reason of no more federal taxes, it seems likely that
the velocity would abate somewhat.
Congruent with this, I propose that non-renewable natural
resources not be exportable except in processed form. These resources are
property of all of us, and our property rights should be respected. Oil would not be exported except as refined
products. Gold would be jewellery, coins or industrial forms.
In addition, the federal government would provide free
post-secondary education by paying tuition in full. Living costs would be the
responsibility of students, but they could obtain student loans to cover them
in full, and these loans would be forgivable at the rate of 1/15 per annum of
the amount borrowed, provided that the student was working in a Canadian
position for 30 hours a week, or was prevented from doing so solely by
disability.
Furthermore, let the market determine interest rates. They
would now be a function solely of the supply of and demand for money.
Government would no longer be competing with businesses and consumers for
funds, so this would help ease the demand. The extra money in the hands of
people because of no federal taxes would help increase the supply of money
also, so rates would tend to not be onerous.
What would the consequences of all this be? Business would
want to move TO Canada instead of away as a result of abundant well educated
labor, easy to obtain materials (raw non-renewables are not being exported, and
materials from outside the country can be imported with no duty), money being obtainable
for funding capital formation, and no confiscatory taxes. A very competitive business environment that
would tend towards creation of jobs for almost everyone that wanted to work.
By and large, the Libertarian platform seems thoughtful, and
maybe one day someone of influence in that party might decide to make the
Gordon Feil suggestions part of their campaign. Sigh. Wouldn’t that be cool?
You conclude quite quickly that hyper inflation wouldn't become a problem due to a "legislated limit" on printing money. But realistically, a limit low enough to mitigate inflation while still paying for all of our governments expenses (plus free school!) simply doesn't exist. Even if it did, how could we entrust any government to keep below it?
ReplyDeleteExcuse me. I just realized that I neglected your final question. We would need a legislative safeguard. I am not a law-maker, but I am confident that we have within this country people capable of crafting and drafting simple legislation, complete with punishments, to coerce governments to keep the money expansion below a specified ceiling. Maybe that ceiling would be a fixed percentage, or perhaps it would be set according to a formula.
DeleteThanks for your comment.
ReplyDeleteMy reference was to PRICE inflation. Obviously there would be monetary inflation, i.e.: the money supply would grow. I am suggesting that prices would not grow nearly as much because there would be sufficiently more goods and services available for that money to chase.
Further, I suspect that the savings rate would increase because the increased prosperity would result in decreasing marginal utility for additional purchases. A reduced velocity of money could be expected.
But even if I am wrong, and prices increased in step with the money supply, people would still have more purchasing power because their tax payments would now be in their own hands. Do some research into "Tax Freedom Day" and discover that everything Canadians earn from January 1 to sometime in June covers the taxes for the year.