Monday 31 October 2016

1828 White House race relived?

Donald Trump is right: the game is rigged. But I doubt that he understands how or what to do about it. So long as we have big government and millions of regulations to enforce the spirit of half of the Ten Commandments, the rigging mechanisms will remain intact. 


This U.S. presidential election is an entertaining, but sad affair. It reminds me a bit of the 1828 race between Andrew Jackson and incumbent John Quincy Adams. Adams was big-time establishment and Jackson was the upstart who had made a name for himself with his career up to that time. Jackson didn’t mind saying what was on his mind, and what was on his mind was not favorable to Adams who, in Jackson’s mind, had stolen the 1824 election. In that election, Jackson had won both the popular vote and apparently the electoral college votes, but then the Speaker of the House met with Adams and went back to work on the College. In the end, the College disregarded the election results and selected Adams as President. The Speaker became his Secretary of State, and in those days, the Secretary of State was the presumptive heir to the presidential throne. Presidents typically were Secretary of State first and later President. No wonder Jackson was hostile towards Adams. And Adams wasn’t cozy with Jackson either. Rigged elections are not new. Neither are rigged economies. Maybe a discussion about that next post.

In the meantime, our poor southerly neighbors are trying to decide which is the lesser of two evils. It’s too bad Gary Johnson wasn’t allowed into the televised debates. Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats want outsiders there. That is part of the rigging. And there is no way anyone wins that election without being in the debates. Too bad, because candidate Johnson seems to offer something better than conniving or idiocy.